On 09/09/16 16:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 09/09/16 16:14, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 09/09/16 15:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 09/09/16 14:45, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>> On 09/09/16 10:33, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>>> Hi Marc,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/09/16 10:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +extern struct static_key_false kvm_gicv3_cpuif;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we should follow the model set by kvm_vgic_global_state, which
>>>>>>> is declared in arm_vgic.h. Even better, we should *embed* the static key
>>>>>>> in this structure. This will reduce the clutter and we wouldn't have to
>>>>>>> deal with all the section stuff (the hyp_data thing is a good cleanup,
>>>>>>> but I'd like to see it as a separate patch if possible).
>>>>> Yes, it is what I was thinking about too, but was not sure about which
>>>>> way to go, so hyp_data seemed me something we might reuse latter.
>>>>> However, I agree that we can defer hyp_data thing...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've just tried it out and it seems that static keys are not happy to
>>>> accept a key after kern_hyp_va is applied at &kvm_vgic_global_state:
>>>
>>> Ah, there is a trick. You do not need kern_hyp_va at all, because this
>>> is not evaluated as an expression at runtime (so the pointer doesn't matter).
>>>
>>
>> Ah, right, thank for a tip! ;)
>>
>>>>> In file included from ./include/linux/jump_label.h:105:0,
>>>>> from arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c:19:
>>>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h: In function ‘__guest_run’:
>>>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:31:2: warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn’t match constraints
>>>>> asm goto("1: nop\n\t"
>>>>> ^
>>>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:31:2: warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn’t match constraints
>>>>> asm goto("1: nop\n\t"
>>>>> ^
>>>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:31:2: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
>>>>> asm goto("1: nop\n\t"
>>>>> ^
>>>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:31:2: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
>>>>> asm goto("1: nop\n\t"
>>>>> ^
>>>>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.o] Error 1
>>>>> make: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.o] Error 2
>>>>
>>>> it looks like we cannot avoid hyp_data thing... if you don't mind I can
>>>> do hyp_data clean-up in separate patch. Alternatively, we can do
>>>> conversion to static keys for both architectures later as an
>>>> optimisation step.
>>>
>>> Can you try the above first? I've just tried the same approach with my
>>> vgic-trap series, and it compiles fine (untested though):
>>
>> I was about to try it out, but didn't manage to find a branch with
>> vgic-trap series, so I did a quick fixup for my series and now it is
>> running non-VHE boot tests and I don't expect issues with VHE one. I
>> think diff bellow should work runtime too, but if you do want me to give
>> it a try it'd be handy to have a branch I can pull from ;)
>
> I think Christoffer has pulled it into kvmarm/queue.
Nothing has exploded so far for both architectures.
Cheers
Vladimir
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
