On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>
> Sorry, missed this one
>
> On 05/09/16 12:29, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >>
> >> > +static bool __hyp_text __has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3) && (read_sysreg(ID_PFR1) >> 28))
> > Do we have a define for bit 28 we could use?
>
> I'll check it.
>
> >
> > Does this actually work on all v7 boards? The v7 ARM ARM seems to state
> > that this bitfield is Reserved, UNK. Does that somehow mean 'is going
> > to be zero'?
>
> It is how v7ARM ARM I have defines UNK
>
> An abbreviation indicating that software must treat a field as
> containing an UNKNOWN value. Hardware must implement the bit as read as
> 0, or all 0s for a bit field. Software must not rely on the field
> reading as zero.
>
> It seems goes under 'is going to be zero' case, no?
>
The last sentence is disturbing to me, and feels slightly contradicting
itself. Reading the UNKNOWN description doesn't help much either.
Perhaps you can ask around internally and figure out what the precise
answer to this is?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
