On 25/07/16 14:50, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/07/16 09:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 25/07/16 09:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 25/07/16 07:14, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>>> On 2016-07-24 05:36, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:22:55 +0100
>>>>> Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:56:44 -0700
>>>>>> Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2016-07-22 10:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 22/07/16 18:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/16 15:35, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:42:02AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/16 06:57, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried KVM on a Cortex-A7 platform (i.MX 7Dual SoC) and encountered
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this stack trace immediately after invoking qemu-system-arm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffe4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pgd = 8ca52740
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ffffffe4] *pgd=80000080007003, *pmd=8ff7e003, *pte=00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internal error: Oops: 207 [#1] SMP ARM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 329 Comm: qemu-system-arm Tainted: G W
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.7.0-rc7-00094-gea3ed2c #109
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardware name: Freescale i.MX7 Dual (Device Tree)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> task: 8ca3ee40 ti: 8d2b0000 task.ti: 8d2b0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x8/0x1dc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LR is at kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate+0x8c/0x224
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pc : [<8027c87c>] lr : [<802172d4>] psr: 60070013
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sp : 8d2b1e38 ip : 8d2b0000 fp : 00000001
>>>>>>>>>>>>> r10: 8d2b0000 r9 : 00010000 r8 : 8d2b8e54
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fec 30be0000.ethernet eth0: MDIO read timeout
>>>>>>>>>>>>> r7 : 8d2b8000 r6 : 8d2b8e74 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ffffffe0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> r3 : 00004ead r2 : 00000000 r1 : 00000000 r0 : ffffffe0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Control: 30c5387d Table: 8ca52740 DAC: fffffffd
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Process qemu-system-arm (pid: 329, stack limit = 0x8d2b0210)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stack: (0x8d2b1e38 to 0x8d2b2000)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1e20: ffffffe0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1e40: 8d2b8e74 8d2b8000 8d2b8e54 00010000 8d2b0000 802172d4 8d2b8000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 810074f8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1e60: 81007508 8ca5f800 8d284000 00010000 8d2b0000 8020fbd4 8ce9a000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ca5f800
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1e80: 00000000 00010000 00000000 00ff0000 8d284000 00000000 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7ffbfeff
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1ea0: fffffffe 00000000 8d28b780 00000000 755fec6c 00000000 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ffffe000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1ec0: 8d2b8000 00000000 8d28b780 00000000 755fec6c 8020af90 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8023f248
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1ee0: 0000000a 755fe98c 8d2b1f08 00000008 8021aa84 ffffe000 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f00: 8a00d860 8d28b780 80334f94 00000000 8d2b0000 80334748 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f20: 00000000 8d28b780 00004000 00000009 8d28b500 00000024 8104ebee
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 80bc2ec4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f40: 80bafa24 8034138c 00000000 00000000 80341248 00000000 755fec6c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 007c1e70
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f60: 00000009 00004258 0000ae80 8d28b781 00000009 8d28b780 0000ae80
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f80: 8d2b0000 00000000 755fec6c 80334f94 007c1e70 322a7400 00004258
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00000036
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fa0: 8021aa84 8021a900 007c1e70 322a7400 00000009 0000ae80 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 755feac0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fc0: 007c1e70 322a7400 00004258 00000036 7e9aff58 01151da4 76f8b4c0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 755fec6c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fe0: 0038192c 755fea9c 00048ae7 7697d66c 60070010 00000009 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [<8027c87c>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<802172d4>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate+0x8c/0x224)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [<802172d4>] (kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate) from [<8020fbd4>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x110/0x478)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [<8020fbd4>] (kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run) from [<8020af90>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2e0/0x6d4)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [<8020af90>] (kvm_vcpu_ioctl) from [<80334748>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x8b8)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [<80334748>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<80334f94>] (SyS_ioctl+0x34/0x5c)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [<80334f94>] (SyS_ioctl) from [<8021a900>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Code: e49de004 ea09ea24 e92d47f0 e3043ead (e5902004)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa206 ]---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I use CONFIG_KVM_NEW_VGIC=y. This happens to me with a rather minimal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qemu invocation (qemu-system-arm -enable-kvm -M virt -cpu host
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -nographic -serial stdio -kernel zImage).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using a bit older Qemu version 2.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I just tried with a self compiled QEMU 2.4.0 and the Ubuntu 14.04
>>>>>>>>>>>> provided 2.0.0, it worked fine with Linus' current HEAD as a host kernel
>>>>>>>>>>>> on a Midway (Cortex-A15).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can reproduce the issue with a latest QEMU build on AMD Seattle
>>>>>>>>>>> (I haven't tried anywhere else yet)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to disable the new VGIC, just to see if that's a regression?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Disabling NEW_VGIC "fixes" guest boots.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not using defconfig for my host kernel. I'll do a couple more
>>>>>>>>>>> tests and provide a comparison of my config vs. a defconfig in
>>>>>>>>>>> a few minutes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Damn. It is not failing for me, so it has to be a kernel config thing...
>>>>>>>>>> If you can narrow it down to the difference with defconfig, that'd be
>>>>>>>>>> tremendously helpful.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's PAGE_SIZE; 64K doesn't work, 4K does, regardless of VA_BITS
>>>>>>>>> selection.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That definitely doesn't match Stefan's report (32bit only has 4k). I'll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hehe, was just plowing through code and came to that conclusion, glad I
>>>>>>> got that right :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What defconfig do you use? I could reproduce the issue also with
>>>>>>> multi_v7_defconfig + ARM_LPAE + KVM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm now on -rc7 with multi_v7_defconfig + LPAE + KVM (and everything
>>>>>> built-in to make my life simpler). The host works perfectly, and I can
>>>>>> spawn VMs without any issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've tested with QEMU emulator version 2.2.0 (Debian 1:2.2+dfsg-5exp)
>>>>>> as packaged with Jessie from a while ago. I've also upgraded the box to
>>>>>> something more recent (2.5), same effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, I am not exactly on vanilla 4.7-rc7, I merged Shawns for-next +
>>>>>>> clock next to get to the bits and pieces required for my board...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That said, it works fine otherwise, and the stacktrace looks rather
>>>>>>> platform independent...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, and if these clocks were doing anything unsavoury, we'd
>>>>>> probably see other things exploding. So we need to find out where we
>>>>>> are diverging.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What compiler are you using? I just noticed that my build
>>>>>> infrastructure is a bit outdated for 32bit ARM (gcc 4.9.2), so I'm
>>>>>> going to upgrade that to gcc 5.3 and retest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same thing. The damn thing stubbornly works.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please send your full configuration, compiler version, exact QEMU
>>>>> command line, and any other detail that could be vaguely relevant. As
>>>>> the old VGIC gets removed in 4.8, we definitely need to nail that
>>>>> sucker right now.
>>>>
>>>> I built the kernel with
>>>> gcc-linaro-5.2-2015.11-2-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf the binaries built
>>>> by Linaro (full config attached). For the Rootfs (and Qemu) I did use
>>>> the same compiler version, but built using OpenEmbedded.
>>>>
>>>> Running on a Colibri module using NXP i.MX 7Dual SoC, I haven't used it
>>>> that much on mainline but it seems to be rather stable so far.
>>>>
>>>> I can reproduce the issue with a minimal command such as this:
>>>> qemu-system-arm -enable-kvm -M virt -cpu host
>>>>
>>>> [ 179.430694] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
>>>> fffffffc
>>>> What is puzzling me a bit that the address the kernel tries to access is
>>>> constantly 0xfffffffc. This would be -4, which would be -EINTR? A
>>>> unhandled error return?
>>>
>>> Your initial report had 0xffffffe4 instead. Which looks a bit like a
>>> "container_of" operation on a NULL pointer. Do you always get the same
>>> backtrace? If so, any chance you could run a
>>>
>>> arm-linux-gnueabihf-addr2line -e vmlinux -i TheCrashingPC
>>
>> Actually, try with the LR value, not the PC.
>
> I didn't see it crash, but from comparing the PC offsets of my
> disassembly and Stefan's and correlating the assembly with the C code I
> am quite sure it's this lock here:
>
> static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> ....
> list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) }
> -----> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> if (unlikely(vgic_target_oracle(irq) != vcpu))
> goto next;
>
> I can see from the assembly that we would call _raw_spin_lock with -4 in
> r0 if the list pointer would be NULL, which makes me wonder if we either
> step on an uninitialised VCPU or if it's a bogus IRQ we are looking at?
Drew saw it pointing at the similar sequence in compute_ap_list_depth.
News flash: Mark Rutland just saw it crashing on his Seattle using my
kernel that doesn't crash on mine. So we're looking at external factors
now. DT, firmware, whatever.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
