Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Introduce 64-bit reg access support

[Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>]

On 20/07/16 14:02, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> vgic_attr_regs_access() handles only 32-bit register
> value. Introduce union ureg to handle both 32 and 64 bit
> register size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> index cc843fe..cace996 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>  #include "vgic.h"
>  
> +union ureg {
> +	u32 reg32;
> +	u64 reg64;
> +};
> +

Please don't. That's pointlessly ugly, and creates type confusion. I
want to see explicit types, all the time.

>  /* common helpers */
>  
>  static int vgic_check_ioaddr(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> @@ -255,7 +260,7 @@ void kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type)
>   */
>  static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  				 struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> -				 u32 *reg, bool is_write)
> +				 union ureg *reg, bool is_write)

Just pass a u64 pointer here...

>  {
>  	gpa_t addr;
>  	int cpuid, ret, c;
> @@ -293,10 +298,10 @@ static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,

	u32 tmp32;

	if (is_write)
		tmp32 = *reg;
		
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS:
> -		ret = vgic_v2_cpuif_uaccess(vcpu, is_write, addr, reg);
> +		ret = vgic_v2_cpuif_uaccess(vcpu, is_write, addr, &reg->reg32);

use tmp32 here.

>  		break;
>  	case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_DIST_REGS:
> -		ret = vgic_v2_dist_uaccess(vcpu, is_write, addr, reg);
> +		ret = vgic_v2_dist_uaccess(vcpu, is_write, addr, &reg->reg32);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;

and in the epilogue:

	if (!is_write)
		*reg = tmp32;

> @@ -328,9 +333,9 @@ static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  	case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_DIST_REGS:
>  	case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS: {
>  		u32 __user *uaddr = (u32 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> -		u32 reg;
> +		union ureg reg;
>  
> -		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> +		if (get_user(reg.reg32, uaddr))
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  
>  		return vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, true);
> @@ -353,12 +358,12 @@ static int vgic_v2_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  	case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_DIST_REGS:
>  	case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS: {
>  		u32 __user *uaddr = (u32 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> -		u32 reg = 0;
> +		union ureg reg;
>  
>  		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, false);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -		return put_user(reg, uaddr);
> +		return put_user(reg.reg32, uaddr);
>  	}
>  	}
>  
> 

Same thing everywhere.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm