Hi, On 04/07/16 14:54, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 04/07/2016 15:38, Andre Przywara wrote: >> 2) on KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR check that "initialized" is false >> 3) on KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT check that "initialized" is false >> 4) after KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT set initialized to true >> >> I don't want to rely solely on vgic_its_base being ADDR_UNDEF, since I >> expect we extend that interface later by supporting more options (for >> instance to size the virtual ITS, in terms of devices, number of LPIs, >> collections, etc.) >> >> Does that make sense? >> Or do we need more here? > > So you will accept a call to KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT with an unset > address? I don't think this is relevant. Ah, good point. Will fix this. However I think we do the same on GICv2/GICv3 at the moment. CTRL_INIT will succeed, I guess we fail the first KVM_RUN then, right? Cheers, _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
