On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Implement a default routing table made of flat irqchip routing
> entries (gsi = irqchip.pin) covering the VGIC SPI indexes.
> This routing table is overwritten by the first user-space call
> to KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
so before applying this patch, but after applying the previous patch,
will our current GICv2m-based MSI injection work?
If not, is there a better split of these patches (e.g. squash this one
into the previous one)?
> ---
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
> index e4459e3..041443b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>
> + ret = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> dist->initialized = true;
> out:
> return ret;
> @@ -454,3 +458,23 @@ out_free_irq:
> kvm_get_running_vcpus());
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +int kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries;
> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> + u32 nr = dist->nr_spis;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + entries = kcalloc(nr, sizeof(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
I think you need to check if the allocation succeeded here or not...
> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> + entries[i].gsi = i;
> + entries[i].type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP;
> + entries[i].u.irqchip.irqchip = 0;
> + entries[i].u.irqchip.pin = i;
> + }
> + ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, entries, nr, 0);
> + kfree(entries);
> + return ret;
> +}
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
