Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] arm64: kvm: Fix {V}TCR_EL2_TG0 mask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/03/16 14:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 14/03/16 16:53, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
{V}TCR_EL2_TG0 is a 2bit wide field, where:

  00 - 4K
  01 - 64K
  10 - 16K

But we use only 1 bit, which has worked well so far since
we never cared about 16K. Fix it for 16K support.


--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
  #define TCR_EL2_TBI	(1 << 20)
  #define TCR_EL2_PS	(7 << 16)
  #define TCR_EL2_PS_40B	(2 << 16)
-#define TCR_EL2_TG0	(1 << 14)
+#define TCR_EL2_TG0	(3 << 14)
  #define TCR_EL2_SH0	(3 << 12)
  #define TCR_EL2_ORGN0	(3 << 10)
  #define TCR_EL2_IRGN0	(3 << 8)
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
  /* VTCR_EL2 Registers bits */
  #define VTCR_EL2_RES1		(1 << 31)
  #define VTCR_EL2_PS_MASK	(7 << 16)
-#define VTCR_EL2_TG0_MASK	(1 << 14)
+#define VTCR_EL2_TG0_MASK	(3 << 14)
  #define VTCR_EL2_TG0_4K		(0 << 14)
  #define VTCR_EL2_TG0_64K	(1 << 14)
  #define VTCR_EL2_SH0_MASK	(3 << 12)


As we already have arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h defining
TCR_TG0_{4,16,64}K, would it make sense to reuse those and drop the
locally defined values? Something like:

#define TCR_EL2_TG0_4K	TCR_TG0_4K

?

We could do that for both TCR_EL2 and VTCR_EL2.

Btw, since this patch doesn't touch any of those fields and fixes an issue,
I will keep that change separate. I can squash it to the following cleanup
patch in this series.

Cheers
Suzuki


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux