On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:49:37PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> When we set up GSI routing to map MSIs to KVM's GSI numbers, we
> write the current device's MSI setup into the kernel routing table.
> However the device driver in the guest can use PCI configuration space
> accesses to change the MSI configuration (address and/or payload data).
> Whenever this happens after we have setup the routing table already,
> we must amend the previously sent data.
> So when MSI-X PCI config space accesses write address or payload,
> find the associated GSI number and the matching routing table entry
> and update the kernel routing table (only if the data has changed).
>
> This fixes vhost-net, where the queue's IRQFD was setup before the
> MSI vectors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/kvm/irq.h | 1 +
> irq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virtio/pci.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/irq.h b/include/kvm/irq.h
> index bb71521..f35eb7e 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/irq.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/irq.h
> @@ -21,5 +21,6 @@ int irq__exit(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> int irq__allocate_routing_entry(void);
> int irq__add_msix_route(struct kvm *kvm, struct msi_msg *msg);
> +void irq__update_msix_route(struct kvm *kvm, u32 gsi, struct msi_msg *msg);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/irq.c b/irq.c
> index 1aee478..25ac8d7 100644
> --- a/irq.c
> +++ b/irq.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,37 @@ int irq__add_msix_route(struct kvm *kvm, struct msi_msg *msg)
> return next_gsi++;
> }
>
> +static bool update_data(u32 *ptr, u32 newdata)
> +{
> + if (*ptr == newdata)
> + return false;
> +
> + *ptr = newdata;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +void irq__update_msix_route(struct kvm *kvm, u32 gsi, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct kvm_irq_routing_msi *entry;
> + unsigned int i;
> + bool changed;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < irq_routing->nr; i++)
> + if (gsi == irq_routing->entries[i].gsi)
> + break;
> + if (i == irq_routing->nr)
> + return;
> +
> + entry = &irq_routing->entries[i].u.msi;
> +
> + changed = update_data(&entry->address_hi, msg->address_hi);
> + changed |= update_data(&entry->address_lo, msg->address_lo);
> + changed |= update_data(&entry->data, msg->data);
> +
> + if (changed)
> + ioctl(kvm->vm_fd, KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, irq_routing);
> +}
What goes wrong if you just call the ioctl every time? Is this actually
a fast path in practice?
Will
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
