On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:00:40PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 22/02/16 11:52, Brian Starkey wrote:
This will create a new conflict, but will make the resolution 100%
clear.
I applied this, but arm64 defconfig wouldn't build until I uncommented
the '#define kvm_call_hyp(...' line.
Is that right?
This patch is intended as a merge indication so that when you do the
merge with the arm64 tree, it conflicts and you can resolve it by going
the right thing (merging the non-comment version of this line).
Right, now I understand "make the resolution 100% clear" - I guess 100%
clear isn't clear enough for me :-(
I've not seen that used as notation before, thanks for explaining.
-Brian
So yes, uncommenting it is the right thing to do.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
