On 22 December 2015 at 14:39, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:08:10AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Won't this result in our incorrectly skipping the first insn >> in the fault handler if the original offending instruction >> was itself the first insn in the fault handler? >> > Wouldn't that then loop with the exception forever? Yes, but so would real hardware... thanks -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
