Hello! > > This patch does not touch any virtual timer code, suggesting that timer > > hardware is actually in place. Normally on boards in question it is true, > > however since vGIC is missing, it is impossible to correctly utilize > > interrupts from the virtual timer. Since virtual timer handling is in > > active redevelopment now, handling in it userspace is out of scope at > > the moment. The guest is currently suggested to use some memory-mapped > > timer which can be emulated in userspace. > > Not sure I understand this paragraph. Either drop it or just say "The > architectured timers are not supported without the in-kernel vGIC." Ok, i'll repost with changed message. But, just to let you know, with this (http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg124539.html) the notice about architected timer loses its relevancy at all. So, i'll just drop it. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
