On 10/23/2015 03:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 23 October 2015 14:37:10 Eric Auger wrote:
>> +
>> +void vfio_platform_unregister_reset(const char *compat)
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_platform_reset_node *iter, *temp;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, temp, &reset_list, link) {
>> + if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat)) {
>> + list_del(&iter->link);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&driver_lock);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_platform_unregister_reset);
>>
>
> This is slightly unsafe in case you ever get two drivers that register
> with the same compat string. If we care about that, we could pass
> and compare both the string and the function pointer, or the
> vfio_platform_reset_node.
OK
Thanks
Eric
>
> Arnd
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
