Hello! > It is really up to whoever adds support for LPIs to make sure it's done > correctly. So I think this is for Andre to work out in his ITS series. > > This patch fixes an issue with the current code in the correct way as > far as I can tell. Ok. An alternate way is to introduce a function which would check for any pending LPIs. I will suggest a fix on top of the current series after some time. I'm cc'ing this whole discussion to Andre. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
