On 09/10/15 08:30, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >> + KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS >> + Attributes: >> + The attr field of kvm_device_attr encodes two values: >> + bits: | 63 .... 32 | 31 .... 16 | 15 .... 0 | >> + values: | mpidr | RES | instr | > > One small clarification: do you really want it to be different from KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS? One is memory mapped, the other one is a system register. One is addressed by a linear index, the other one by affinity. How do you reconcile the two? What's the point of trying to shoehorn a different concept into the existing API? M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
