On 22/07/15 08:19, Pavel Fedin wrote: >> I don't care much for such an API, mostly because it will obviously >> bitrot very quickly (your "broken VGIC" platform is hopefully a one off >> that won't be repeated again, and the RPi is out of scope anyway). >> >> It would have to be extremely non-intrusive and completely safe for this >> to be taken in... > > Ok, let's leave this API alone then for now... > Will then be a concensus if i tweak the thing a little bit and we just enable KVM without both vGIC > and vTimer ? It will be an emulator's problem how to handle them then. Well, let's see the patches first, and how invasive they are. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
