On 2015-06-25 11:25, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 25.06.2015 11:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 25 June 2015 at 09:59, Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Once the VM is created, I think QEMU should not request kvm to
>>> change the virtual offset of the VM anymore: maybe an unexpected
>>> consequence of QEMU's target-arm/kvm64.c::kvm_arch_put_registers ?
>>
>> Hmm. In general we assume that we can:
>> * stop the VM
>> * read all the guest system registers
>> * write those values back again
>> * restart the VM
>>
>> if we need to. Is that what's happening here, or are we doing
>> something odder?
>>
>> -- PMM
>>
>
> What I guess could be happening by looking at the code in linux
>
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c::kvm_arm_timer_set_reg
>
> is that QEMU tries to set the KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT register from exactly the previous value,
> but just because of the fact that the set function is called, cntvoff is updated,
> since the value provided by the user is apparently assumed to be _relative_ to the physical timer.
>
> This is apparent to me in the code in that function which says:
>
> case KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT: {
> /* ... */
> u64 cntvoff = kvm_phys_timer_read() - value;
> /* ... */
> }
>
> And this is matched by the corresponding get function kvm_arm_timer_get_reg where it says:
>
> case KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT:
> return kvm_phys_timer_read() - vcpu->kvm->arch.timer.cntvoff;
>
> The time difference between when the GET is issued by QEMU and when the PUT is issued then would account for the difference.
QEMU has the concept of write-back levels: KVM_PUT_RUNTIME_STATE,
KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE and KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE. I suspect this registers is
just sorted into the wrong category, thus written as part of the
RUNTIME_STATE. We had such bug patterns during the x86 maturing phase as
well.
Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
