On 25 June 2015 at 09:00, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course, KVM can deny an unsupported configuration, but I am wondering > if we really think anybody will care about the 'model such specific > hardware' aspect with KVM, or if we should only consider the 'I want a > VM with x VCPUs' scenario, in which case the second option below seems > simpler to me. I agree it's not very likely anybody cares about the specific cluster topology. However if we don't want to support arbitrary topologies then QEMU is going to end up in the business of editing the user supplied device tree blob to make its cpu definitions match up with whatever the kernel provides, which could be pretty tedious. -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
