On 05/25/2015 05:01 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 May 2015 at 14:09, Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>>> typedef struct MemMapEntry {
>>> @@ -88,6 +90,7 @@ typedef struct VirtBoardInfo {
>>> int fdt_size;
>>> uint32_t clock_phandle;
>>> uint32_t gic_phandle;
>>> + uint32_t v2m_phandle;
>>> } VirtBoardInfo;
>>
>> Could you rename v2m_phandle to something more neutral like msi_phandle ? It will also be
>> used by GICv3 ITS implementation.
>
> Why? The v2m device isn't really related to the GICv3...
In the future this handle could point to GICv2m or GICv3 ITS or GICv3
(if I understand it correctly, when it supports message base interrupts
and no ITS). They all would play the same role of msi-controller.
Best Regards
Eric
>
> -- PMM
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
