On 29/04/2015 10:37, Eric Auger wrote: >> > This should be an unref. > oups yes. > > Thanks! Do I keep this series or do I revert to sysbus irq connect irq > temporary patch as per Peter's last email? I think reverting is better since you need a respin and Peter offered to touch the code later. Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
