Re: [PATCH v12 3/4] hw/arm/virt: add dynamic sysbus device support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27 April 2015 at 18:04, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 06:58 PM, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> I'm not sure I have an opinion one way or the other, but I would like to
>> understand the "big waste" argument. Is there something that users are
>> eager
>> to reuse this address space for, like more RAM?
>
>
> It will get used for platform device assignment. If we only reserve 32MB we
> will quickly run out of address space to map devices into.

Personally I am hoping that platform device assignment will
also turn out to be mostly for legacy reasons and anybody
wanting to do serious device passthrough will be doing it with
PCI...

-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux