On 04/24/2015 11:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 24/04/2015 11:01, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> void sysbus_init_irq(SysBusDevice *dev, qemu_irq *p)
>>>> {
>>>> SysBusDeviceClass *sdc = SYSBUS_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(dev);
>>>> qdev_init_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(dev), p, SYSBUS_DEVICE_GPIO_IRQ, 1,
>>>> sdc->irq_set_hook);
>>>> }
>> Hi Paolo
>>
>> I implemented this alternative but my concern is the check method is
>> called before the qemu_irq setting. So on this callback I cannot
>> retrieve the qemu_irq VFIOINTp struct container object needed to setup
>> irqfd hence does not work for me.
>
> Isn't the qemu_irq passed as the third argument to the callback? I
> thought this solution was fine because you weren't passing the "int n"
> from sysbus_connect_irq to your notifier.
Yes it is. But I need to access the EventNotifiers for trigger &
resample which were initialized before for eventfd trigger and stored in
the container object. Will study if I can restructure the code ...
Thanks
Eric
>
> If you really cannot make it work, I guess your "sysbus: add
> irq_routing_notifier" patch would be okay. I would only ask you to move
> the function pointer from SysBusDevice to SysBusDeviceClass.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
>> I would need a post_check cb. Do you
>> think it it sensible to add another cb?
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
