Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Will, > > On 18/02/15 15:50, Will Deacon wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> Thanks for doing this. Since it looks unlikely that kvmtool will ever be >> merged back into the kernel tree, it makes sense to cut the dependency >> in my opinion. >> <snip> > > P.S. Although both approaches still provide the kvmtool patch history, > they do not compile before the dependency cut patches. If that is an > issue, one could think about injecting those new patches back into the > repository time line. Admittedly that sounds scary, but would solve the > problem. If you can have it all it would be nice to preserve buildability all through your history for bisecting (and the moon on a stick please ;-) Is the dependency on the kernel sources something that has been stable over the projects history or something that's been declining/increasing over time? -- Alex Bennée _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
