On 19/02/2015 18:55, Andrew Jones wrote: >> > > (I don't have an exact number for how many times it went to EL1 because >> > > access_mair() doesn't have a trace point.) >> > > (I got the 62873 number by testing a 3rd kernel build that only had patch >> > > 3/3 applied to the base, and counting kvm_toggle_cache events.) >> > > (The number 50 is the number of kvm_toggle_cache events *without* 3/3 >> > > applied.) >> > > >> > > I consider this bad news because, even considering it only goes to EL2, >> > > it goes a ton more than it used to. I realize patch 3/3 isn't the final >> > > plan for enabling traps though. If a full guest boots, can you try timing a kernel compile? Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
