On 3 December 2014 at 20:17, Christoffer Dall
<christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When resetting a VCPU we currently call both kvm_arm_vcpu_init() and
> write_kvmstate_to_list(), both of which can fail, but we never check the
> return value.
>
> The only choice here is to print an error an exit if the calls fail.
I like this patch, but it is going to conflict with a patch I'm
nearly done testing and plan to send tomorrow that unifies the
sysreg handling for 32 and 64 bit KVM/ARM. Part of what that
involves is using a single kvm_arm_reset_vcpu() in kvm.c rather
than different 32 and 64 bit versions. So you should probably
respin this patch on top of that one.
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> target-arm/kvm32.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> target-arm/kvm64.c | 8 +++++++-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/kvm32.c b/target-arm/kvm32.c
> index 5ec4eb1..1fd0e83 100644
> --- a/target-arm/kvm32.c
> +++ b/target-arm/kvm32.c
> @@ -511,9 +511,18 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
>
> void kvm_arm_reset_vcpu(ARMCPU *cpu)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> /* Re-init VCPU so that all registers are set to
> * their respective reset values.
> */
> - kvm_arm_vcpu_init(CPU(cpu));
> - write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu);
> + ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_init(CPU(cpu));
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "kvm_arm_vcpu_init failed: %s\n", strerror(ret));
Shouldn't this be strerror(-ret) ?
thanks
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
