Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: kvm: drop inappropriate use of kvm_is_mmio_pfn()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/12/2014 10:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 21 November 2014 at 12:24, Christoffer Dall
> <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:33:55AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Instead of using kvm_is_mmio_pfn() to decide whether a host region
>>> should be stage 2 mapped with device attributes, add a new static
>>> function kvm_is_device_pfn() that disregards RAM pages with the
>>> reserved bit set, as those should usually not be mapped as device
>>> memory.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> index 57a403a5c22b..b007438242e2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -834,6 +834,11 @@ static bool kvm_is_write_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>       return kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(vcpu);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>>> +{
>>> +     return !pfn_valid(pfn);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>>>                         struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
>>>                         unsigned long fault_status)
>>> @@ -904,7 +909,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>>>       if (is_error_pfn(pfn))
>>>               return -EFAULT;
>>>
>>> -     if (kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn))
>>> +     if (kvm_is_device_pfn(pfn))
>>>               mem_type = PAGE_S2_DEVICE;
>>>
>>>       spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.2
>>>
>> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> These 2 patches are now in 3.18-rc7, so they can be dropped from the
> kvmarm queue/next/etc branches

If they are in queue, they can be dropped.  If they are in next, please
leave them in as the next branch should not be rebased.  Duplicate
commits are generally harmless.

Paolo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux