On 17/11/14 09:27, wanghaibin wrote:
> After recalculated the irq state of per vcpu, maybe, there is some vcpus
> became the state that have none pending irq form the state have pending
> irqs.
> So, it should be better that clear the irq_pending_on_cpu flag when
> recalculated result is false.
Can you demonstrate a case where this is actually useful?
Thanks,
M.
> Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index ec2192d..8390475 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -1188,6 +1188,8 @@ static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm)
> if (compute_pending_for_cpu(vcpu)) {
> pr_debug("CPU%d has pending interrupts\n", c);
> set_bit(c, dist->irq_pending_on_cpu);
> + } else {
> + clear_bit(c, dist->irq_pending_on_cpu);
> }
> }
> }
>
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
