Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm/arm64: KVM: vgic: kick the specific vcpu instead of iterating through all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shannon,

On 14/11/14 11:09, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> When call kvm_vgic_inject_irq to inject irq, we've already known
> which vcpu the IRQ for form the cpuid. So we should just kick this
> one vcpu to avoid iterate through all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c |   18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 82db9d6..093f21f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm);
>  static void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
> +static void vgic_kick_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid);
>  static u8 *vgic_get_sgi_sources(struct vgic_dist *dist, int vcpu_id, int sgi);
>  static void vgic_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 reg);
>  static struct vgic_lr vgic_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
> @@ -1589,6 +1590,21 @@ static void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void vgic_kick_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We've injected an interrupt, kick the specified vcpu
> +	 */
> +	if (cpuid < atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
> +		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
> +		if (vcpu != NULL) {
> +			kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int vgic_validate_injection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq, int level)
>  {
>  	int edge_triggered = vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, irq);
> @@ -1694,7 +1710,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int irq_num,
>  {
>  	if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm)) &&
>  	    vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, irq_num, level))
> -		vgic_kick_vcpus(kvm);
> +		vgic_kick_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 

Have you actually tested this? Hint: cpuid is *not* what you think, and
I strongly suggest you play with interrupt affinity in the guest before
posting such changes.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux