On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:26:46PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > The MMIO accessors for GICD_I[CS]ENABLER, GICD_I[CS]PENDR and > GICD_ICFGR behave very similar in GICv3, although the way the > affected vCPU is determined differs. They behave similarly to each other (the registers) or similarly to how they are implemented for GICv2? > Factor out a generic, backend-facing implementation and use small > wrappers in the current GICv2 emulation to ease code sharing later. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> I can't really understand the motivation from your commit message, but the code looks fine and I suppose I'll realize the motivation later: Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
