Re: [PATCH] ARM/ARM64: arch-timer: fix arch_timer_probed logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/2014 01:07 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Daniel,

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:58:29AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/15/2014 05:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Commit c387f07e6205 (clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Discard unavailable
timers correctly) changed the way the driver makes sure both the memory
and system-register timers have been probed before finalizing the probing.

There is a interesting flaw in this logic that leads to this final step
never to be executed. Things seems to work pretty well until something
actually needs the data that is produced during this final stage.

For example, KVM explodes on the first run of a guest when executed on
a platform that has both memory and sysreg nodes (Juno, for example).

Just fix the damned logic, and enjoy booting VMs again.

Tested on a Juno system.

Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
---

Applied to my tree. Also for -next.

Is this going to hit -rc2? This was a regression introduced in -rc1.

Without this fix we've also lost our high precision sched_clock on arm64
platforms.


Sure.

Thomas or Ingo,

is it possible to update the tip/urgent branch, so I can send the fixes against 3.18-rc1 ?

Thanks in advance

  -- Daniel


   drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 6 +++---
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 2133f9d..43005d4 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -660,11 +660,11 @@ static bool __init
   arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
   {
   	struct device_node *dn;
-	bool probed = false;
+	bool probed = true;

   	dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
-	if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
-		probed = true;
+	if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && !(arch_timers_present & type))
+		probed = false;
   	of_node_put(dn);

   	return probed;



--
   <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog




--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm





[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux