On 9 October 2014 15:05, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/09/14 22:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Handle the potential NULL return value of find_vma_intersection()
>> before dereferencing it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 152e0f896e63..c093e95ff7ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -776,7 +776,11 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>> /* Let's check if we will get back a huge page backed by hugetlbfs */
>> down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>> vma = find_vma_intersection(current->mm, hva, hva + 1);
>> - if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
>> + if (unlikely(!vma)) {
>> + kvm_err("Failed to find VMA for hva 0x%lx\n", hva);
>> + up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + } else if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
>
> I'm not overly fond of this "else if" construct. The !vma case is final,
> so what's after cannot be reached.
>
I don't have a strong preference either way. I can respin but perhaps
Christoffer can fix it up when applying?
>> hugetlb = true;
>> gfn = (fault_ipa & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> } else {
>>
>
> Despite the above nit:
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
