On 10/06/2014 11:04 AM, Wei Huang wrote: > Revisited Alexander's patches, I felt that the approach of > if-DT-else-ACPI approach isn't necessary. More importantly this whole > DT parsing in ./virt/kvm/arm can really be avoided. My opinions are: > > 1. All DT-ACPI should happen in respective drivers. In this case, they > should be in clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c and irqchip/irq-gic* only. > The driver will expose necessary info to KVM via public interfaces. > 2. KVM doesn't have to care about DT/ACPI. Instead it only uses the > info provided by the interface from device drivers. I like this approach. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
