On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto: > > No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However > > I did not compile for all architectures. > > --- > > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > > index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 > > --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > > +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ > > #include <linux/seqlock.h> > > #include <trace/events/kvm.h> > > > > -#include "irq.h" > > #include "iodev.h" > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > > > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM > irqfd support. Thanks, > Marc is dealing with the tree this week and the next so he can apply it to kvmarm/queue. Do you want it to wait and go with the irqfd patch (which has dependencies not yet resolved) or should we just queue it? Thanks, -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
