> hmmm, the point is that we need to ensure that we have a properly > aligned allocated PGD, that's what this patch currently addresses, and as > you pointed out, the BUG_ON() just before trying to run a VM is not the > nicest solution - we should really be dealing with this properly at > allocation time. > > But, if you don't have time to look at that, then ok, I'll have to pick > it up myself. > > However, you are hinting that we do not support 4 levels of page tables, > yet you do allow the t0sz_to_vttbr_x funciton to pass even when using > t0sz values only supported under 4 levels of page tables.... What is > the rationale for that? Minimizing merge conflicts. I figure both are going in within the next month or two. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
