On 08/11/2014 11:37 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 09.08.14 16:25, Eric Auger wrote: >> set kvm_irqfds_allowed >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c >> index 5038885..08b7bf9 100644 >> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c >> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c >> @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, >> Error **errp) >> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR, >> KVM_VGIC_V2_ADDR_TYPE_CPU, >> s->dev_fd); >> + >> + kvm_irqfds_allowed = true; > > Is this always true? If it is, why not enable it separately while making > vhost-net work for example? Hi Alex, yes I think so. As soon as KVM is enabled, KVM/arm would enable injection though irqfd. Defintively makes sense to test it with vhost-net too. Well a matter of priority ;-) Best Regards Eric > > Alex > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
