On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 24.07.14 09:36, Eric Auger wrote: >> >> On 07/24/2014 01:02 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> On 23.07.14 17:33, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/08/2014 03:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 07.07.14 09:08, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This method is meant to be called on sysbus device dynamic >>>>>> instantiation (-device option). Devices that support this >>>>>> kind of instantiation must implement this method. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> For the reason I stated earlier, I don't think it's a good idea to put >>>>> device tree code into our device models. >>>> >>>> Hi Alex, >>>> >>>> I would propose we discuss that topic during next KVM call if you are >>>> available. >>> >>> I lost track when that would be. Next week would work fine, the week >>> after not :). >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> Unfortunately I think the last one was this week. If you are available >> next week I would propose to setup a short call next week. > > > Sure! > > >> Who are the >> required people in the call aside us and Peter? > > > It would be good if we could have one person on the call who has a very good > understanding of cross-platform device trees. Scott Wood or Rob Herring come > to my mind here. > > Scott, Rob, would either of you be available for a quick call on device tree > abstraction levels in QEMU Tuesday next week? Yes, I can. Rob _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
