On 07/08/2014 08:55 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:27 +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> hw/vfio/pci.c | 12 ------------ >> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c >> index 5c7bfd5..a7df3de 100644 >> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c >> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c >> @@ -18,26 +18,14 @@ >> * Copyright (C) 2008, IBM, Muli Ben-Yehuda (muli@xxxxxxxxxx) >> */ >> >> -#include <dirent.h> >> #include <linux/vfio.h> >> #include <sys/ioctl.h> >> #include <sys/mman.h> >> -#include <sys/stat.h> >> -#include <sys/types.h> >> -#include <unistd.h> >> - >> -#include "config.h" >> #include "exec/address-spaces.h" >> -#include "exec/memory.h" >> #include "hw/pci/msi.h" >> #include "hw/pci/msix.h" >> -#include "hw/pci/pci.h" >> -#include "qemu-common.h" >> #include "qemu/error-report.h" >> -#include "qemu/event_notifier.h" >> -#include "qemu/queue.h" >> #include "qemu/range.h" >> -#include "sysemu/kvm.h" >> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" >> #include "hw/vfio/vfio.h" > > Was this just a remove and see if it still compiles exercise? I'm not > sure I'm a fan of removing includes that are arbitrarily included via > another include chain. Thanks, Hi Alex. Sorry for the delay, coming back from vacation period... Yes it was a lazy way to sort things out for PCI/platform split. Then I will drop that patch file. Besides, some system includes might be removed thanks to the inclusion of qemu-common.h, which sounds stable/reliable? dirent.h as well? Anyway it does not help in any way for my matters. Best Regards Eric > > Alex > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
