Il 11/07/2014 12:07, Andrew Jones ha scritto:
Yes, you are correct, and I like your design and API better, but with one change. We should introduce phys_addr_t=u64 to common code as well, and then use that instead of uintptr_t/size_t. I'll do this for v7.
Of course. Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
