On Fri, May 09 2014 at 3:06:33 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Instead of directly messing with with the GICH_VMCR bits for the CPU
>> interface save/restore code, add accessors that encode/decode the
>> entire set of registers exposed by VMCR.
>>
>> Not the most efficient thing, but given that this code is only used
>> by the save/restore code, performance is far from being critical.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 9 +++++++
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> index 831b9f5..0017253 100644
>> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ struct vgic_lr {
>> u8 state;
>> };
>>
>> +struct vgic_vmcr {
>> + u32 ctlr;
>> + u32 abpr;
>> + u32 bpr;
>> + u32 pmr;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct vgic_ops {
>> struct vgic_lr (*get_lr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *, int);
>> void (*set_lr)(struct kvm_vcpu *, int, struct vgic_lr);
>> @@ -89,6 +96,8 @@ struct vgic_ops {
>> u32 (*get_interrupt_status)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void (*set_underflow)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void (*clear_underflow)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> + void (*get_vmcr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
>> + void (*set_vmcr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
>> };
>>
>> struct vgic_dist {
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> index 13dad1f..574ca47 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> @@ -100,8 +100,10 @@ static void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
>> static void vgic_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 reg);
>> static struct vgic_lr vgic_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
>> static void vgic_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr, struct vgic_lr lr_desc);
>> -static u32 vgic_nr_lr;
>> +static void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
>> +static void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
>>
>> +static u32 vgic_nr_lr;
>> static unsigned int vgic_maint_irq;
>>
>> static u32 *vgic_bitmap_get_reg(struct vgic_bitmap *x,
>> @@ -1057,6 +1059,28 @@ static void vgic_v2_clear_underflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_hcr &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
>> }
>>
>> +static void vgic_v2_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcrp)
>> +{
>> + u32 vmcr = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_vmcr;
>> +
>> + vmcrp->ctlr = (vmcr & GICH_VMCR_CTRL_MASK) >> GICH_VMCR_CTRL_SHIFT;
>> + vmcrp->abpr = (vmcr & GICH_VMCR_ALIAS_BINPOINT_MASK) >> GICH_VMCR_ALIAS_BINPOINT_SHIFT;
>> + vmcrp->bpr = (vmcr & GICH_VMCR_BINPOINT_MASK) >> GICH_VMCR_BINPOINT_SHIFT;
>> + vmcrp->pmr = (vmcr & GICH_VMCR_PRIMASK_MASK) >> GICH_VMCR_PRIMASK_SHIFT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vgic_v2_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcrp)
>> +{
>> + u32 vmcr;
>> +
>> + vmcr = (vmcrp->ctlr << GICH_VMCR_CTRL_SHIFT) & GICH_VMCR_CTRL_MASK;
>> + vmcr |= (vmcrp->abpr << GICH_VMCR_ALIAS_BINPOINT_SHIFT) & GICH_VMCR_ALIAS_BINPOINT_MASK;
>> + vmcr |= (vmcrp->bpr << GICH_VMCR_BINPOINT_SHIFT) & GICH_VMCR_BINPOINT_MASK;
>> + vmcr |= (vmcrp->pmr << GICH_VMCR_PRIMASK_SHIFT) & GICH_VMCR_PRIMASK_MASK;
>> +
>> + vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_vmcr = vmcr;
>
> did you forget to add this field to the vgic_v2 struct as part of this patch?
I don't think so, I believe it appears in patch #5.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
