On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 04:52:42PM +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote: > The ARM SMMU can take an IOMMU_EXEC protection flag in addition to > IOMMU_READ and IOMMU_WRITE. Expose this as an IOMMU capability. The other way of handling this would be to negate the capability and advertise a NOEXEC cap instead. That would need the IOMMU_EXEC flag to become IOMMU_NOEXEC and the ARM SMMU driver updating accordingly, but it might make more sense if people don't object to mixing positive and negative logic in the IOMMU_* flags. Any thoughts? Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
