Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] ARM: KVM: Enable the ioeventfd capability of KVM on ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 March 2014 17:12, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 05:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 31 March 2014 16:49, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/31/2014 03:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> Er, but we already have a global interrupt index number
>>>> for ARM, it's the value you pass to KVM_IRQ_LINE. What
>>>> extra does IRQ routing bring to the party?
>>>
>>> It allows you to have multiple distributors :). And MSI target IDs that
>>> you
>>> can use for irqfd.
>>
>> What's a distributor in this context? Why would an MSI
>> target ID need to be any different from the ID format
>> we're currently using?
>
>
> Because it may contain more information than the number space allows to
> cover (target address, data payload).

I'm finding this conversation confusing because I think you're
assuming more knowledge about MSI and irqfds than I have.
What I was hoping to provoke with my initial question was
a more detailed explanation of what the API does, when
it gets used and what information gets passed around where.

thanks
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux