On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:23:35PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:41:27PM -0800, Victor Kamensky wrote: > > Switch hypervisor to run in BE mode if image is compiled > > with CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN. > > > > Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/kvm/init.S | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S > > index 1b9844d..74f0718 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S > > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> > > #include <asm/kvm_arm.h> > > #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> > > +#include <asm/assembler.h> > > > > /******************************************************************** > > * Hypervisor initialization > > @@ -70,6 +71,8 @@ __do_hyp_init: > > cmp r0, #0 @ We have a SP? > > bne phase2 @ Yes, second stage init > > > > +ARM_BE8(setend be) @ Switch to Big Endian mode if needed > > + > > @ Set the HTTBR to point to the hypervisor PGD pointer passed > > mcrr p15, 4, r2, r3, c2 > > > > -- > > 1.8.1.4 > > > > Won't splitting up the patches this way break bisectability? > Second thought, scratch that, because BE support is not supposed to work before applying these patches anyhow I guess. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
