Re: [PATCH 02/16] target-arm: A64: Fix bug in add_sub_ext handling of rn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> rn == 31 always means SP (not XZR) whether an add_sub_ext
> instruction is setting the flags or not; only rd has behaviour
> dependent on whether we are setting flags.
>
> Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Laurent

> ---
>  target-arm/translate-a64.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/translate-a64.c b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> index f89b0a5..90936cd 100644
> --- a/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> +++ b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> @@ -3096,12 +3096,11 @@ static void disas_add_sub_ext_reg(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
>
>      /* non-flag setting ops may use SP */
>      if (!setflags) {
> -        tcg_rn = read_cpu_reg_sp(s, rn, sf);
>          tcg_rd = cpu_reg_sp(s, rd);
>      } else {
> -        tcg_rn = read_cpu_reg(s, rn, sf);
>          tcg_rd = cpu_reg(s, rd);
>      }
> +    tcg_rn = read_cpu_reg_sp(s, rn, sf);
>
>      tcg_rm = read_cpu_reg(s, rm, sf);
>      ext_and_shift_reg(tcg_rm, tcg_rm, option, imm3);
> --
> 1.9.0
>

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm





[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux