RE: Asynchronous Page Fault Handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Darn Outlook  didn't spot the CC, oh well it's on the mailing list :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Smarduch [mailto:m.smarduch@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:04 AM
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Asynchronous Page Fault Handling

Hi Marc,
   I don't want to put this on the mailing to.

Do you think ARMv8 is a better target then ARMv7 or start with ARMv7 since there is silicon available?

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:54 PM
To: Mario Smarduch
Cc: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Page Fault Handling

Hi Mario,

On 2014-03-04 17:40, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> Is this feature on the road map? Memory over committed VM vCPUs spend 
> a lot of time waiting on IO.

As it doesn't seem to support non-PV guests, it has never been considered.

Patches welcomed.

         M.
--
Fast, cheap, reliable. Pick two.

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux