On 28 January 2014 17:21, Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/26/2014 11:25 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> +/* Helper functions for pairwise 32 bit comparisons */
>> +static void gen_pmax_s32(TCGv_i32 res, TCGv_i32 op1, TCGv_i32 op2)
>> +{
>> + tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_GE, res, op1, op2, op1, op2);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gen_pmax_u32(TCGv_i32 res, TCGv_i32 op1, TCGv_i32 op2)
>> +{
>> + tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_GEU, res, op1, op2, op1, op2);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gen_pmin_s32(TCGv_i32 res, TCGv_i32 op1, TCGv_i32 op2)
>> +{
>> + tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_LE, res, op1, op2, op1, op2);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gen_pmin_u32(TCGv_i32 res, TCGv_i32 op1, TCGv_i32 op2)
>> +{
>> + tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_LEU, res, op1, op2, op1, op2);
>> +}
>
> These are exactly the sort of helpers I expected to see in the previous patch.
> Thus my question re neon_{min,max}_{s,u}32.
OK, I'll move these to the previous patch and use them there too.
I suspect that the reason for teh helpers existing is they predate
the movcond op.
thanks
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
