On 01/08/2014 04:31 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 January 2014 14:51, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is there an argument for making this an optional component. It would be >> useful to know how many users care about having access to the target >> assembly. Certainly I'm only looking at it while developing TCG code. > If you really don't want the dep you can configure with '--cxx=', and then > we'll fall back to "no C++ compiler, don't build C++-only bits". > > One of my aims here is that I don't particularly want the A64 > translator to be a second class citizen in terms of what features > it supports. Debug logs are generally useful (which is why they're > present) and being able to have end users grab a debug log is > nice for tracking down issues sometimes. It's also very useful to just be able to do "x /i $pc" on the qemu monitor. So yes, a working disassembler is defintiely a must have. Alex _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
