On 12/10/2013 06:16 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > However my preference unless there is a strong objection would be to > clean that up in later patches. For one thing the more instructions each > patch handles the longer it takes to run the instruction validation on > the rather slow models to have good coverage of the decoder! That'd be ok by me. r~ _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
