On 06/12/13 13:03, Andre Przywara wrote: > Yes, there is indeed this problem with the pen. Maybe one can use your > upcoming relocation code to move the pen to a more secure place (defined > per platform). Yes, that's what I've done. Also rewritten some of it to be able to execute solely in secure mode (you can't do SMC+HVC there, as you'd try to run non-secure from secure RAM...). > With "avoid dealing with a pen" you mean to wakeup from the system's pen > and immediately jump to the OS init code, without staying in a wfi loop > in some special memory? Even better, waking up the CPUs from power-off directly, configuring the per-cpu part of the GIC and jumping to the kernel. Almost nothing. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
