[RFC PATCH v3 07/10] arm_gic: Fix gic_acknowledge_irq pending bit clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The pending flags for level-triggered interrupts should not be cleared
if the interrupt input signal remains asserted.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>

Changelog[3]:
 - New patch in the series
---
 hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
index 9811161..20e926c 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
@@ -193,11 +193,15 @@ uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu)
         return 1023;
     }
     s->last_active[new_irq][cpu] = s->running_irq[cpu];
-    /* Clear pending flags for both level and edge triggered interrupts.
-       Level triggered IRQs will be reasserted once they become inactive.  */
+    /* Clear pending flags for edge-triggered and non-asserted level-triggered
+     * interrupts.
+     */
     cm = GIC_TEST_MODEL(new_irq) ? ALL_CPU_MASK : cm;
     GIC_CLEAR_SW_PENDING(new_irq, cm);
-    gic_clear_pending(s, new_irq, cm, GIC_SGI_SRC(new_irq, cpu));
+    if (GIC_TEST_EDGE_TRIGGER(new_irq) || !GIC_TEST_LEVEL(new_irq, cm)) {
+        gic_clear_pending(s, new_irq, cm, GIC_SGI_SRC(new_irq, cpu));
+    }
+
     gic_set_running_irq(s, cpu, new_irq);
     DPRINTF("ACK %d\n", new_irq);
     return new_irq;
-- 
1.8.4.3

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux