On Friday 15 November 2013 10:31 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:29:52PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 15/11/13 15:25, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> On Friday 15 November 2013 10:05 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>> On 14/11/13 19:37, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>>> ARM kvm code will make use of __virt_to_idmap() on arm32 >>>>> machines as hardware interconnect supported alias of physical >>>>> memory for idmap purposes. The same code is shared with arm64 >>>>> bit and hence will break the builds. So we add __virt_to_idmap() >>>>> which is just __virt_to_phys() on arm64 bit to keep build happy. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 8 ++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >>>>> index 3776217..d9341ee 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >>>>> @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ >>>>> #define __phys_to_virt(x) ((unsigned long)((x) - PHYS_OFFSET + PAGE_OFFSET)) >>>>> >>>>> /* >>>>> + * Added to keep arm64 kvm build working which shares code with >>>>> + * 32bit port. ARM kvm code makes use of __virt_to_idmap() on arm32 >>>>> + * machines as hardware interconnect supported alias of physical >>>>> + * memory for idmap purposes. >>>>> + */ >>>>> +#define virt_to_idmap(x) __virt_to_phys(x) >>>>> + >>>>> +/* >>>>> * Convert a physical address to a Page Frame Number and back >>>>> */ >>>>> #define __phys_to_pfn(paddr) ((unsigned long)((paddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'd rather have a kvm_virt_to_phys() in kvm_mmu.h. That's how we've >>>> dealt with that kind of difference so far. >>>> >>> Are you suggesting something like below ? >> >> Yes, I like it a lot more. >> >> Catalin, what do you think? > > It looks better ;) > OK then. I will use this approach in my refreshed version. Still need to get around other lingering issue with guest userspace corruption. Regards, Santosh _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm