On 14 November 2013 05:45, Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14 November 2013 15:27, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 14/11/13 04:27, Anup Patel wrote: >>> On 9 November 2013 10:32, Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 30 July 2013 18:26, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 30/07/13 12:57, Anup Patel wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> This patch allows us to have X-Gene guest VCPU when using KVM arm64 >>>>>>> on APM X-Gene host. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We add KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA for X-Gene Potenza compatible >>>>>>> guest VCPU and we return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA in kvm_target_cpu() >>>>>>> when running on X-Gene host with Potenza core. >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Marc, >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you think more changes are required to this patch ? >>>>> >>>>> Hi Anup, >>>>> >>>>> It looks OK to me as it is. I'll queue it for 3.12. >>>> >>>> Hi Marc, >>>> >>>> I think this patch was missed for 3.12 >>>> >>>> Do you want me to resend this patch ?? >>> >>> Hi Marc, >>> >>> What is missing in this patch ?? >>> >>> Do you want me to resend this patch ?? >> >> I appear to have misplaced it somehow. >> Please resend it . > > I have rechecked this patch against latest Linux stable > tree. It still applies on latest Linux stable tree hence > no need to re-base this patch on latest code. > FYI: a better test is to make sure it applies to kvm/next. -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
